J. Neil Schulman
@ Agorist.com
@ Agorist.com
Author’s Note, April 23, 2012: I have removed the word “gated” from my description of the Twin Lakes community per the following link: “According to Ryan Julison, assistant to Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump, Twin Lakes is actually not entirely gated. There is also no guard at the gate, there are no high fences. The community is just modest condos, Julison says, not protected with the electronic equivalent of a castle moat. So the Gate Access Form provided by The Retreat at Twin Lakes Homeowners Association could be considered somewhat misleading.”
— J. Neil Schulman
On February 26, 2012 George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in the Sanford, Florida Retreat at Twin Lakes community which had recently suffered a spate of home burglaries, observed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin walking in circles in the rain, and telephoned his local police department to report the activity as suspicious. While on the phone with the police dispatcher Zimmerman reportedly followed Martin, and at some point there was a confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin in which witnesses report Zimmerman down on the ground with Martin on top of him. We know this confrontation ended when Zimmerman, who was licensed to carry a concealed firearm, fatally shot Martin.
Zimmerman is now out on bond, charged by Florida with Second Degree Murder. The state’s affidavit in support of this charge alleges that Zimmerman improperly followed Martin, initiating the confrontation, even though in the bail hearing State Investigator Dale Gilbreath testified that Florida does not know whether Zimmerman continued to follow Martin after the police dispatcher advised him this was not needed, and even though according to Dale Gilbreath’s testimony the State does not know whether Zimmerman or Martin started the fight.
But it’s the Florida prosecution’s contention that Zimmerman can not claim self-defense justifying his use of deadly force since by following Martin he created the circumstances leading to the teenager’s death.
Much of the discussion of this case has referred to Zimmerman’s right to be armed, constitutionally preserved under the Second Amendment. I’ve previously written on these pages that instead of restricting George Zimmerman’s right to keep and bear arms, it should have been expanded to include Trayvon Martin’s right to defend his life.
But what has not been discussed is whether as a Neighborhood Watch volunteer, George Zimmerman was acting properly in following Trayvon Martin.
I think the Third Amendment speaks to that question.
The Third Amendment reads, “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”
A narrow reading of this prohibition against “quartering” has failed to find a legal case to apply it to in the 221 years since it was added to the Bill of Rights. But this amendment’s placement between amendments preserving the right to keep and bear arms and restrictions on the powers of the government with respect to the privacy of the people deserves closer examination.
The Framers of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights did not see a clear distinction between soldiers and police officers. There were no municipal police departments in the United States at the time the Bill of Rights was under discussion, and crime control was the responsibility of the citizenry at large, responding to a “hue and cry” and organized ad hoc under the Power of the County — today still known using the original Latin phrase, posse comitatus. The American experience of the recent British subjects was that British soldiers were used by the royally-appointed governors as police officers. Embedding such officers among the people by quartering them in private homes was just one particularly egregious way of taxing the Americans to pay for the protection “services” being provided to them by their government.
Neighborhood Watch Volunteer George Zimmerman
After the 1992 Los Angeles riots I applied for and received a California license to carry a concealed firearm — which I carried in California until 2007 — and as training I took California’s PC-832 course, and passed the California POST exam. My Powers of Arrest and Communications and Tactics instructor, Jim Saharek, was a retired U.S. Secret Service agent; my Firearms instructor, Barry Dineen, was an LAPD officer. I got a perfect 4.0 grade in all three modules, as well as on the final POST exam.
POST Certificate
Regarding the George Zimmerman case.
There’s an aspect to this case which I have not heard discussed: that the “police” powers of a private citizen are in many cases identical to a sworn police officer’s — and for a good reason; most police powers originate with the private citizen. George Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch security volunteer on private property that he was authorized to be on.
When George Zimmerman observed Trayvon Martin acting in a manner he considered suspicious — walking around in circles in the rain — Citizen Zimmerman was acting within his assigned role to investigate further.
Citizen Zimmerman was acting within his proper role as a private Neighborhood Watch security volunteer to track Trayvon Martin, and to approach Trayvon Martin to ask him whether he lived on the property or who he was visiting.
The police dispatcher Zimmerman was talking to on the phone had an inferior understanding of the tactical situation than the security officer on scene (Zimmerman) and the dispatcher’s statement “We don’t need you to [follow your suspect]” was a well-intentioned attempt to keep Zimmerman out of jeopardy; but Zimmerman was the security officer on scene and was within his duty to pursue if he thought by doing so he was acting in protection of his neighbors’ safety.
I’ve heard TV pundits refer to George Zimmerman as a wannabe cop or “self appointed” neighborhood watch volunteer. This is a denigration of the private citizen’s responsibility to protect his neighborhood that would have shocked the Founding Fathers, who considered it was precisely the role of the private citizen to protect his neighbors whether as posse comitatus or as militia; the idea of standing police departments or military officers quartered among the people (Third Amendment prohibition) was exactly what the American Revolution — and the preservation of its principles in the Bill of Rights — was designed to escape.
I’m suggesting the Third Amendment opens a window to the context and mindset of the Framers regarding a standing paramilitary police department embedded among the people — beyond the literal and narrow text of the Third Amendment. The Supreme Court might well call this the “penumbra” of the Third Amendment.
It’s the denigration of the private citizen using “police” powers to protect his community — and the usurpation of these powers by a centralized authority — that is one of the principal methods by which Americans are infantalized by a paternalistic government.
It’s one of the main Progressive strategies since the late nineteenth century tilting us into a top-down authoritarian order. We now see how these usurped police powers are commonly abused against the citizenry.
We see it in SWAT teams breaking down the doors of private homes, and sometimes killing the homeowners, in a War on Drugs that trivializes the Fourth Amendment and usurps rights still held by the People under the Ninth Amendment.
We see it when police racially profile minorities, whether black youths like Trayvon Martin or Hispanics like George Zimmerman, who police think might be illegally in the country.
We see it in police officers arresting citizens who legally have the right to video or photograph them while executing their police powers in public places.
We see it in the common excessive use of police powers, in handcuffing even a six-year-old girl being taken into police custody for throwing a tantrum while in a kindergarten class.
We see it in TSA officers touching the private parts of women, children, and senior citizens, whose only crime is an intent to board a commercial airliner.
If merely by following Trayvon Martin, pursuant to his responsibilities as a Neighborhood Watch Volunteer, Citizen Zimmerman loses his right of self-defense, then there is one more disempowerment of the sovereign American citizen as understood by the Founders.
This prosecution is one more indication that the progressive centralization of authority in soldiers embedded among the citizens is a counterrevolution far along its way of reversing the liberties fought for and won in the American Revolution.
This article is Copyright © 2012 The J. Neil Schulman Living Trust. All rights reserved.
Winner of the Special Jury Prize for Libertarian Ideals from the 2011 Anthem Film Festival! My comic thriller Lady Magdalene’s — a movie I wrote, produced, directed, and acted in it — is now available free on the web linked from the official movie website. If you like the way I think, I think you’ll like this movie. Check it out!
April 23, 2012 - 5:35 pm
TY J NEIL SCHULMAN… AWESOME ARTICLE.
April 23, 2012 - 7:38 pm
Neil,
I agree with you.
Florida’s basic self defense law applies in this case despite what the liberal pundits and race-baiters would like for you to believe.
There is no law against following somebody..There is no law against questioning somebody. Zimmerman broke no laws and therefore cannot be charged with murder or anything else simply for defending himself.
You have law enforcement training Neil, so you know as well as I do that a well placed punch (or head being bashed on the concrete) could easily disorient a person to the point of knocking him senseless. At which time that same person could easily be disarmed. We all know the consequences of that happening. If you’re packing legal heat and you’re physically attacked just as Martin attacked Zimmerman, your first concern must be to defend your life and maintain possession of your firearm by any means necessary, or the consequences would mean certain death. You know those thoughts must have passed through Zimmerman’s head as he was knocked to the ground and beaten into the concrete by Martin.
Police will most certainly use deadly force if you try to disarm them. Why would it not be reasonable to think that any normal person wouldn’t do the exact same thing?
If Zimmerman had done anything illegal such as threaten or assault Martin, the basic self defense law would not apply.
He did neither of those things. He was simply and clearly only defending himself from a perceived fatal attack. Therefore, Zimmerman’s innocence must be, shall be, and will be upheld on the strength of Florida’s existing self defense law.
Period.
Brian
April 24, 2012 - 9:50 am
Three slightly separate points: I have read this post several times and still cannot see the connection between the Third Amendment (the quartering of soldiers in private homes during peacetime) and the right of a citizen to defend his own life and property. Other than, that is, the fact that quartering soldiers in private homes itself threatens a citizens peace and property.
While I understand that during the Colonial period there was no distinction between solider and police, even so I would hazard a guess that to follow and accost another citizen – then kill that citizen for defending HIS right to walk through a neighborhood – would not be seen as reasonable to our Founding Fathers.
George Zimmerman, according to reports, appears to have been, in fact, self-appointed, and several statements by national sheriff organizations and neighborhood watch groups have agreed that it goes against their rules to attempt to make an arrest. I do realize that such statements might seem to affirm your contention that the police have overreaching powers, but I think it worth reminding readers that Mr. Zimmerman’s actions were not those approved of by these national organizations. Mr. Zimmerman had no ID, uniform, or presented anything else that might distinguish him from a garden-variety stalker or mugger, against whom we do have very real laws. Quite frankly, in such a situation I would have defended myself against his interference in my peaceful evening walk in any way available to me.
April 24, 2012 - 10:05 am
I would like to add one more thought, if I may…
There does exist, of course, the concept and practice of the “citizen’s arrest”. It is very old and dates to medieval times. Clearly it should be in every citizen’s power to make a citizen’s arrest, but laws are very specific as to how much power and in what circumstances one may exercise this right. Wikipedia does a fair job of enumerating and spelling out the rights of the citizen in each of the Western countries. But in all cases, the arresting citizen is responsible should anything go wrong, if they injure a person or violate in turn their civil rights. Here is the link for your readers’ interest and perhaps your own: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen's_arrest
April 24, 2012 - 12:07 pm
Forgive me, but I find this article most confusing. I absolutely agree that, in point of fact, all citizens do indeed have much the same powers as police. Police are also susceptible to the same laws as everyone else.
I fail to see the relevance. Were Zimmerman in fact an (un-uniformed) police officer, I don’t see how it would change the case at all. An unarmed man is still dead. Indeed, I would imagine that the ‘libertarian’ defense of Zimmerman would not be happening were he a cop.
Zimmerman didn’t ask Martin what he was doing, or who he was, when he had suspicion-he followed him furtively, without identifying himself on a rainy night. I would consider that a threat, as I presume any rational person would.
In Ohio, this is a felony crime in and of itself-Menacing By Stalking(of a minor):
http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2903.211
I don’t know about Florida, but I presume that a similar law exists.
April 24, 2012 - 12:15 pm
General Shamman, you ASSume several points that you do not know, unless you are in fact an eye witness.
By what report do base the statement Z “accosted” M?
By what facts do you “know” Z was self appointed?
By what facts to you “know” the Twin Lakes community was affiliated with national sheriff organizations and neighborhood watch groups or bound by their “rules”?
We have Z’s statement, yet you are able to disprove it as a lie, how?
Did the police contact report also contain false hoods?
April 24, 2012 - 12:24 pm
What happened to M,s father’s girlfriend? why does he appear only with M’s mother now.
Why would a juvenile, not in his regular neighborhood, not walk on the footpath, or street?
I am telling you, someone comes to take your stuff, don’t expect any help from me.
April 24, 2012 - 12:25 pm
Hey Neil,
Are we ever going to get anymore Heinlein centered works from you?
If you and Pournelle could get together and write the definitive Robert and Virginia Heinlein’s perspective of today, it would be great.
We are certainly living in “the Crazy Years” complete with the Interregnum. It has all gone bad.
Regards
April 24, 2012 - 1:24 pm
“I would hazard a guess that to follow and accost another citizen – then kill that citizen for defending HIS right to walk through a neighborhood”
And according to Florida State Investigator Dale Gilbreath testifying in Zimmerman’s bail hearing, the prosecution has no knowledge that this happened.
April 24, 2012 - 1:26 pm
“Zimmerman didn’t ask Martin what he was doing, or who he was, when he had suspicion-he followed him furtively, without identifying himself on a rainy night.”
And you know that Zimmerman did precisely this …. how?
April 24, 2012 - 2:03 pm
Maybe this might help:
Robert A. Heinlein: In Dialogue with His Century: Volume 1 (1907-1948): Learning Curve by William H. Patterson (Jun 21, 2011)
April 24, 2012 - 3:15 pm
Thank you for your response to my post. This is part of the official statement from the National Sheriffs Association. The whole statement is too long to quote here but is easily found online and was reported shortly after the incident hit the headlines:
“The alleged action of a “self-appointed neighborhood watchman” last month in Sanford, FL significantly contradicts the principles of the Neighborhood Watch Program,” stated NSA Executive Director Aaron D. Kennard, Sheriff (ret.). “NSA has no information indicating the community where the incident occurred has ever even registered with the NSA Neighborhood Watch program.”
I have not read the police reports but they are also available online. I believe you will find them at The Hinky Meter: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2012/04/20/trayvon-martin-case-bond-hearing-today-police-report-details/#more-9983
April 24, 2012 - 3:37 pm
Would you clarify what you intended to say by introducing the Third Amendment in this case? I have not understood your meaning. Perhaps others have not as well.
None of this is to say that I believe citizens should not make an arrest if they witness a crime and can do so safely. They can and do and so they should. My own son apprehended a purse snatcher last year in downtown Detroit by running him down and wearing him out, holding him until police arrived, then returned the purse to the woman from whom it was snatched. He was equipped with only a pocket knife (okay, he is on the Fencing team and could probably remove all your brass buttons and hand them to you in one gesture but still…). But he didn’t need it and thank goodness the other guy wasn’t armed either. The call I received about it that night made this parent’s blood run cold but yes, I do believe in the concept of the “citizen’s arrest” and of course I was proud as well. In my son’s case, however, he actually witnessed a crime, as did several other people, and he did not actually harm the other individual nor did he violate his civil rights. Regardless of what any of us believe actually happened that night between Zimmerman and Martin, there is obviously enough doubt to justify investigating it. If Zimmerman is found to have accosted Martin without reason, merely by “profiling” him as suspicious, then he will be held responsible for his actions and rightly so according to law.
April 25, 2012 - 4:48 am
Well, I’m now having a fine time looking up the history of the police in America. Just FYI…
“The United States has a system of policing based on the modern English (British) Form.[citation needed]
In 1789 the US Marshals Service was established, followed by other federal services such as the US Parks Police (1791)[20] and US Mint Police (1792).[21] The first city police services were established in Philadelphia in 1751,[22] Richmond, Virginia in 1807,[23] Boston in 1838,[24] and New York in 1845.[25] The US Secret Service was founded in 1865 and was for some time the main investigative body for the federal government.[26]” -from Wikipedia.
I had no real idea that our police system was quite that old. The US Parks Police was established by George Washington himself. Of course, the concept of a sheriff is very old and very English (remember the “Sheriff of Nottingham?) And then there were the night watch and the slave patrols… It seems the English didn’t like the idea of “police” because the concept and name were French!
Another fascinating post, leading me to reading.
April 25, 2012 - 12:58 pm
Department stores, electronic stores, clothing stores, etc., hire people who are not sworn police officers — they’re called security officers — to follow customers who they think look or are acting in a suspicious manner. The question of who is “suspicious” is a subjective decision based on the experience of the watcher.
George Zimmerman said to the police dispatcher that he saw a man he did not know wearing a hoodie walking in circles in the rain. He said he thought he looked “up to no good.”
Zimmerman was acting as a volunteer security officer on private property. His suspicions were at a level high enough for him to telephone the police. There had been burglaries and Trayvon Martin matched the profile of the burglary suspects.
Zimmerman was within his rights as a resident on that property. He did not recognize Trayvon Martin as a fellow resident because Trayvon Martin was not a resident. There are no security guards at gates in that private community passing in only visitors; anyone can walk in. So Zimmerman was within his rights to ask Trayvon Martin who he was visiting.
That’s not stalking. That’s being a good neighbor.
April 25, 2012 - 1:12 pm
The U.S. Marshals Service were officers of the federal courts, to serve warrants, protect courtrooms, and enforce court orders.
They were not driving around public streets looking at the citizenry as criminal suspects.
The “police department” George Washington started was not embedded among the people, where they lived. Its jurisdiction ended when not on park land owned by the federal government.
The U.S. Secret Service was started to be bodyguards for the President, and later to be the arm of the Treasury Department investigating counterfeiting of government-issued money.
Also not government soldiers quartered among the citizenry.
July 8, 2012 - 12:59 pm
The people of one community has no more rights then the people of another community. The city of Sanford Florida is governed by the city officials whom were all appointed via a legally recognized voting process. The city consist of a Mayor, Police Chief, Fire Chief, etc.
Move over you cannot jump over the law to claim that, if a community based group chooses a person such as Zimmerman to guard the community, because the group does not reflect that power, Retreat at Twin lakes was not a locked community, it had gates and as long as your had been allowed to enter Retreat at Twin Lakes by a resident you were allowed beyond the gate, it did not matter if you brought 20 guess with you once they were inside that gate they were within reason not breaking the law.
The resident of the community has a protocol. If you see something suspicious call the LOCAL POLICE. unless it is an EMERGENCY call 911 who contacts the proper authorities. That would be Police Fire Ambulance. Regular citizens to not have the authority to respond to what they have not been trained for this is why they have college’s and university’s. George Zimmerman had none of the requirements that supports his claim that is was the NIGHT WATCH MAN/ SECURITY GUARD .
He went beyond the expectations of a neighborhood watch program’s expectation. when Zimmerman called 911his duty a neighborhood watchman/ security watchman ended . The Sanford police told him as it was noticed that Zimmerman got out of his car to follow his suspect.. The Sanford Police don’t need YOU to do that. Subsequently he did exactly as he was told not to do. It is very apparent George Zimmerman was agitated from comments he’d made during the 911 call he made. He subjectively stated THEY ALWAYS GET AWAY.. HE STATES THE KID RAN…F%$@ING COONS… WITHIN A FEW MINUETS the 911 call line was flooded with call.. SO WHO WAS THE AGGRESSOR.
White people that a racist will always try to rewrite, or change the meaning to what is said LAW when it come having whiter/ lighter skin, maybe you have forgotten we are in the 21ST century. And America has changed it racist mindset, it is not about being black or white anymore. So trying to sway the public into a KKK mindset is not working remembering that is important.
July 8, 2012 - 1:30 pm
Communities don’t have rights. Only individuals have rights. And, any “police” powers are nothing more than an individual’s right to protect life and property from invaders.
I’m not a fan of homeowner’s associations. I lived in a gated community in Culver City, CA, run by an HOA from 1997 to 2006 and found the HOA to be the worst bunch of imperious assholes I ever met in my life. Their powers to enforce their stupid rules with a mortgage on ever town home was akin to living in a little soviet. I couldn’t wait to sell our town home and move into a private house again, and pledged never again to live under the communistic rule of an HOA.
Nonetheless, if by contract with each other home owners decide to form a community by contract, that contract is valid. And the authorization of an HOA to form a neighborhood watch to protect their property is as valid a use of common “police” powers as is a mall or big box store hiring security guards.
George Zimmerman was appointed as a security officer by the property owners of the Twin Lakes community. He had authority to find out who Trayvon Martin was and whether he was a new resident or a guest visiting a resident. If Martin attacked Zimmerman — as Zimmerman’s self-defense claim is not now contradicted by any publicly released evidence — then Trayvon Martin’s attack on George Zimmerman was the same as anyone who attacked a bank security guard.
Zimmerman needed no additional authorization to question Martin. He was the officer on scene; the police operator had no authority or superior tactical view to tell him how to handle the situation. It was Zimmerman’s call to make.
It has nothing to do with race. The principle is the same if the skin colors had been reversed.
And I suggest you watch the movie Deacons for Defense for an example of where the shoe was on the other foot: blacks defending themselves on the basis of their own property rights from invaders wearing the white robes of the KKK. In that historical case the police were on the side of the invaders against the home owners.
August 2, 2012 - 5:00 am
I think that the third amendment was used in a case where soldiers were housed in homes that striking prison guards were forced to leave. The homes, I think, were on prison grounds, but they were still the homes of these guards. The thought that it might have some bearing in this case is pushing it, although I follow your train of thought and agree with much of it :>)